John Thomas Bryant Jr., may someday be known as the father of astrotometry, (a new science with a holistic viewpoint) inasmuch as he provides an interesting analysis of interactions among the planets and the sun within the solar system - like a "flux transfer."
Bryant views the universe as being not only connected, but essentially one thing. And, applying science in a profoundly novel way, he has come to study the Sun’s effect on the Earth in more ways than just heat, magnetics and electrical phenomena. He has been called a "Techo-Shaman" by one analyst, Rob Bryangton.
"Technically, Astrotometry is a study of the relationships among the concepts of space, time, energy, matter, and physical motion. Astrotometry better qualifies these concepts and provides breakthrough understandings of their manifestation and behavior," Bryant says in an Internet blog post.
Bryant is said to be seeking to to being able to predict things like earthquakes, storms, tsunamis by using astrotometry as his new revolutionary tool. The astrotometry theory appears to be similar to that advanced by British astrophysicist Piers Corbyn.
This Blogger is curious when seeing these continued reports. I am left wondering how much 'real science' vs. 'junk science' there is in these New Age theories. Your comments realting to the validity of "astrometry," please.
3 comments:
Based on his Youtube channel...the bullshit detector is blowing up.
To John Thomas Bryant Jr
Astrotometry, is almost the same as Astrometry, is Astrotometry really a trademark? If so I cannot find it registered, on the following sites, US Patents and trademark office, Madrid System, WIPO resources, INTA, UK gov trademarks office, perhaps you could inform me where you trademark Astrotometry is registered, further could you explain to me in scientific terms, observed and measured, what you mean by your statement……….
Sustained higher frequency energy moving through the disturbance from multiple active solar regions is likely to mitigate this potential seismic activity, …So what higher frequency energy,, higher than what?
and how do you measure it. What disturbance, what is it and how do you measure it? Multiple active solar regions, I understand that stars are “Active” , and there many solar systems, so what? And how does all this mitigate seismic activity. Forgive me but I do not understand what you are talking about. But I am willing to learn.
Peter Sweden
1a2bcea channel
I believe Mr. Bryant may be onto something quite brilliant here. It seems like he might be wrestling to find a few pieces of the puzzle, but there is a certain validity in his work. Why do people immediately label a notion as bullshit just because it does not comfortably fit in with mainstream scientific theories? The most brilliant people throughout history are the ones who came forth with bold new concepts that usually challenged and shook the foundation of old and trusted ideas, that with time were found to be in error. The Earth is not flat, but round. The Sun does not revolve around the Earth, but the Earth around the sun. Two objects of different masses could not possibly fall at the same speed if dropped from the same height at the same time, but they do. Throughout history, errors in science have been trusted as fact, only later to be corrected and then built upon by "shamanic" men of science. Shamanic men of science have existed since science began! These type of people are the out of the box thinkers who usher in a new age, a new technology, or even, a new science.
Post a Comment